I love breaking rules. Think of rules as being there to push up against -- in relation to mining for meaning, for finding unwinding, signing... even. Like Shakespeare does with fates in myths. Albeit deformed by post modern cut ups, three body problems, and principles of uncertainty as waves and particle. Cheers for the holiday.
Back at ya’! Waves and particles that simultaneously defy simple views by impossibly co-existing… mining for meaning that begins with a hunch or a tickle and motivates deep digging … very rich phrases for professional development. I the YouTube the presenters spend half an hour or so in a slow motion search for particles to fill a paragraph on why summer is the best of times. There is no wave.
what no wave? wave is a description for something that is used to measure frequency -- particles are points, waves are cycles. Joyce pins word particles into the movement of a wave, beckett is especially cyclic... ✍️
No, they were looking for a wave, I think, and it didn’t much matter what particles the group reluctantly emitted to attach if they floated into one. In the lesson much effort went toward having a brainstorm to generate details to put in a list in support of the claim that summer is the best season of the year. Then came the list—linear, no curvatoll. The damned list. Then they collaborated on writing a topic sentence (summer is great) and organized some words from the list (ice cream, swimming, trips, gardening). Not one mention of summer reading or writing. The words then were inserted into clauses. It reminded me of what I’ve been reading about sponsored AI authorship, automated scoring stuff, etc. I wish there was more information about the participants. I heard the number 56, and a few spoken comments were made—a presenter said there were teachers, principals, superintendents, Board members (I may be wrong here on Board members), and professors (with certainty I remember that). It seemed so incongruous that 56 people who care enough about teaching kids didn’t push back. Silence doesn’t cut it. I hope some at least were there to observe out of concern rather than to catch an instructional wave.
I love breaking rules. Think of rules as being there to push up against -- in relation to mining for meaning, for finding unwinding, signing... even. Like Shakespeare does with fates in myths. Albeit deformed by post modern cut ups, three body problems, and principles of uncertainty as waves and particle. Cheers for the holiday.
Back at ya’! Waves and particles that simultaneously defy simple views by impossibly co-existing… mining for meaning that begins with a hunch or a tickle and motivates deep digging … very rich phrases for professional development. I the YouTube the presenters spend half an hour or so in a slow motion search for particles to fill a paragraph on why summer is the best of times. There is no wave.
what no wave? wave is a description for something that is used to measure frequency -- particles are points, waves are cycles. Joyce pins word particles into the movement of a wave, beckett is especially cyclic... ✍️
No, they were looking for a wave, I think, and it didn’t much matter what particles the group reluctantly emitted to attach if they floated into one. In the lesson much effort went toward having a brainstorm to generate details to put in a list in support of the claim that summer is the best season of the year. Then came the list—linear, no curvatoll. The damned list. Then they collaborated on writing a topic sentence (summer is great) and organized some words from the list (ice cream, swimming, trips, gardening). Not one mention of summer reading or writing. The words then were inserted into clauses. It reminded me of what I’ve been reading about sponsored AI authorship, automated scoring stuff, etc. I wish there was more information about the participants. I heard the number 56, and a few spoken comments were made—a presenter said there were teachers, principals, superintendents, Board members (I may be wrong here on Board members), and professors (with certainty I remember that). It seemed so incongruous that 56 people who care enough about teaching kids didn’t push back. Silence doesn’t cut it. I hope some at least were there to observe out of concern rather than to catch an instructional wave.