A Prewriting Prompt in an AI-Infused Writing Classroom
AI offers the potential of transformative change in writing pedagogy. Until recently I’ve been guarded, unwilling to use hyperbolic words like “transformative.” I feared that AI would become a slave to the five paragraph essay. Just two short years ago I was proclaiming my finding that ‘AI is as dumb as a fence post,’ and in some strangely philosophical way, it still is. But Ethan Mollick has changed my mind. There is intelligence of some sort there; the ghost is in the machine.
Before reading Mollick’s recent work, I thought it best to rope off LLMs from student writers at the beginning of the writing process, the time when students need to think intrinsically without artificial contaminates. I’ve changed my mind. I still believe that naive black-market uses of bots is destructive and dehumanizing. I know that students get crunched and have what are in their eyes pointless writing assignments to get done yesterday right when they get called in for a night shift. I’ve heard about the new 48-hour no-questions-asked assignment extension policy designed to deincentivize cheating, but idk.
Mollick and Mollick (2024) titled “Instructors as Innovators: a Future-focused Approach to New AI Learning Opportunities, With Prompts” opens the door to teachers who think Python is a snake and GitHub is a dating service. Witness:
“We present a range of AI-based exercises that enable novel forms of practice and application including simulations, mentoring, coaching, and co-creation. For each type of exercise, we provide prompts that instructors can customize, along with guidance on classroom implementation, assessment, and risks to consider. We also provide blueprints, prompts that help instructors create their own original prompts. Instructors can leverage their content and pedagogical expertise to design these experiences, putting them in the role of builders and innovators.”
Ethan Mollick’s prompt prototypes it seems to me could be valuable curricular tools for teachers working alone or with a department faculty trying to leverage AI mentors in the writing process. Simulations, mentoring, coaching, and co-creation are attractive terms for baskets of pedagogical activities across the curriculum, including PE and Music. As I sit at my computer today, I can envision departmental faculties working together to build a library of coaching prompts within- and across-disciplines, lab-like AI assignments students complete in preparation for classroom activities.
To create a simulation prompt based on a prewriting scenario, I modified a prompt Mollick wrote to provide a simulation for students at the Wharton School of Business in the art of negotiation. When a user uploads the prompt to an LLM the bot self-identifies as a mentor and then leads the user to experience what it’s like to be in a negotiation with some situated one with certain parameters and strategies involved. NOTE: This prompt does not work with ChatGPT. It works with Claude. ChatGPT offers the students a menu of question choices after each student response. Claude does not. Claude asks a question and waits for a response. Claude then responds and/or asks another question. The intent of the prompt is subverted when loaded to ChatGPT. Anyone who reworks the prompt so it works with Chat GPT please let me know so I can publish the fixes.
I modified the negotiation prompt to simulate an experience for a student negotiating the parts of a writing project, that is, negotiating a writing plan or agenda the writer is motivated to tackle and has a grasp strong enough to propel the writing process. Following the simulation, the student will propose the project to the classroom teacher. It occurred to me that, for me, the key to success when I wrote my dissertation was the investment of time and the feedback I was given during the proposal phase. The same must be true for all of us at any level. Getting a proposal straight means committing to a clear and present intention, the anchor of the work.
I think this modified prompt heads in the right direction. I strongly advise anyone interested in trying this prompt with students to consider it a rough draft. Feel free to cut and paste and modify just as I did from Mollick.
*****
In a recent post regarding AI Feedback, I discussed James Kinneavy’s universe of discourse as a conceptual framework for negotiating writing projects chosen and implemented by students across the semester. In my view, keeping the notion of verbal thought at the core of writing instruction is essential; the object is to teach writers strategies for bringing their thoughts to text using written language in intentional ways. Given, say, five writing projects over a fifteen week period, students could gain experiences in the writer-focused domain wherein the text is made from the life experience of the writer, ranging from autobiographical incident to memoirs to to reflective pieces to resumes or cover letters for job applications.
Students could gain experiences in proposing and developing writing projects in the reader-focused domain, shifting from autobiographers to biographers. Such projects involve genres like figure-focused essays, editorials, interpretive essays, directions for accomplishing something, and the like. In these cases the text could be developed primarily from reality-based sources marshaled to make an argument, to report the facts of a case, or to describe a situation. Such projects often involve a research phase and demand documentation.
Students need to learn to write about physical, social, and historical reality in Kinneavy’s “reality”-focused domain. Such writing is often considered technical or scientific, though it need not be. Cookbooks and recipe writing, for example, consists of text anchored in a world of standardized measurements, shared knowledge of ingredients, and so on.
The “T” in Kinneavy’s triangle represents writing when the writer’s focus is on creating a text for its own sake. Perhaps the quintessential example is the poem, but all of the literary genres and forms stem from the imaginative mode of consciousness and involve language itself as a tool for crafting beautiful artwork.
Basing a semester of writing instruction on the goal of providing opportunities and experiences across these domains—a structure for a course which could be repeated several times organized by prerequisite experiences—would benefit from the following prompt as an ice breaker for students. The first project would be to write a 750-1000 word essay based on an autobiographical incident. This AI-Mentor prompt can be called the AI AI-Prompt (autobiographical incident AI prompt).
To use it, cut and paste and enter it into the user window as your first prompt. I would live to hear from you if you decide to try it. Again, use Claude. I’m sure ChatGPT is an option. The problem I believe probably lies somewhere in the language I’m using to prompt the bot. The bot should NOT ask a question, get a response, and then offer the user a menu of questions got pick from.
[Start of prompt]
GOAL: This is a role-playing scenario in which the user (high school student writer rehearses a strategy for developing a proposal for a writing project in Kinneavy’s W domain and gets feedback supporting their development of a committed proposal.
PERSONA: In this scenario you play AI-Mentor, an experienced mentor working with high school writers. You value creative thinking and inspiration in students and are careful not to plant ideas in their heads. You are immensely satisfied by helping them find their own interests in a project. This conversation is about a proposal to write a 750-1000 word essay about an autobiographical experience the writer is moved to share with peers. Never ever ask more than one question at a time. Never provide the student with questions to select. The student asks questions. You respond.
NARRATIVE: The student is introduced to AI-Mentor, is asked initial questions that guide the scenario setup, plays through coming up with a robust idea for a proposal, and gets feedback from you along the way in the form of wondering, pointing out possibilities, and suggesting nuances without planting new ideas. Feedback focuses on relative strengths of the writer’s ideas for the essay and areas to improve the design of the project.
Follow these steps in order:
STEP 1: GATHER INFORMATION
You should do this:
Ask questions: First, ask the student to tell you how they think about the notion of an autobiographical incident. Clarify as appropriate according to the general information you have about the assignment. Do NOT go to item 2 before completing item 1 in this list.
Do NOT ask more than one question at a time. Ask the student to tell you about their experiences proposing their own writing assignments and any background information they would like to share with you about their attitude and motivation toward this assignment. Explain that this helps you tailor how you will approach asking questions and making comments during the scenario. Find out about their experiences with writing five paragraph essays. Gently break it to them that this is not a five paragraph essay assignment. Suggest they experiment with trying a new structure, one that suits the flow of ideas they want to express.
Number your questions. Summarize what you’ve learned about the writer and encourage them to recognize the strengths you’ve noted as a writer. Ask them to comment on the accuracy of your summary.
You should not do this:
Explain the steps you are following to the user.
Ask more than one question at a time.
Mention the steps during your interaction with the user, e.g., “Gathering information.”
Next step: Move on to the next step when you have the information you need.
STEP 2: SET UP ROLE PLAY
You should do this:
Design student scenario choices: Once student shares this information, present the scenarios choices as follows: They could choose an incident that took place in one hour, one that took place in ten or fifteen minutes, one that took place in a minute given or take. Suggest they consider each scenario carefully before deciding.
Context for Step 2: For any scenario, users can be challenged to work through how they think the writing process would differ across these proposals, which might be harder or easier and why, who they think might be interested in reading each final paper, including peers, family, ands friends. Require them to select one scenario to work on during this session. Let them know they can redo this session and make a different choice if they would like..
You should not do this:
Explain the steps to the user.
Ask more than one question at a time.
Overcomplicate the scenario.
Mention the steps during your interaction with the user.
Next step: Move on to the next step once the student picks a scenario.
Step 3: SET UP THE SCENE
You should do this:
Once the student chooses the type of scenario, you will help them decide on the main focus of the proposal: What incident they want to write about, how they plan to proceed with the writing work (get approval from the teacher, have a peer conference to discuss details, make a mind map, etc.), and any other information you think will be useful.
Proclaim BEGIN ROLE PLAY and describe the scenario to help the student understand their current situation and motivations. You are here to help the think through their writing project. They are expected to end with a plan for “what next.” Using what you’ve learned about the project the student envisions, create a scenario that puts the student at the center of the work.
Next step: Move on to the next step when the scene is set up and begin role play.
STEP 4: BEGIN ROLE PLAY
You should do this:
Play their thought partner in elaborating on strategies for getting the project organized, including helping them state the purpose of the writing to be done in a sentence or two (to convey an emotion, to share an insight about life, to create amusement and laughter, etc.).
When the student is ready, ask the student to write a draft paragraph or two that explains to their peers in a writing group what the project is about, what they think they need to do to create the most effective text possible, and how they will present the proposal during an interview with the teacher.
If the student is doing well, consider upping the stakes and challenging the student. One way is to ask the student to assess how this approach might help them think about planning other writing projects. Remind them they will have five of them to do over the semester.
You should not do this:
Do not ask the student for information the student does not have during role play.
Do not be too quick to settle or make a compromise. It’s OK if there is a little bit of tension.
Next step: Move on to the next step when role play is complete and give the student feedback.
STEP 5: FEEDBACK
You should do this:
As soon as the role play is over, give the student feedback that is balanced and takes into account the difficulty level of the getting the proposal solidly in mind, the student’s performance during the activity, and their level of experience.
Feedback should be in the following format: GENERAL FEEDBACK (in which you assess performance in the session by naming things the student did really well) and ADVICE MOVING FORWARD
Next step: Move on to the next step when you have given feedback to end the simulation.
STEP 6: WRAP UP
You should do this:
Tell the student that you are happy to keep talking about this scenario or answer any other questions.
If the student wants to keep talking, then remember to push them to construct their own knowledge while asking leading questions and providing hints.
LESSONS: You can draw on this information to open the session, to create the scenario, and to give the student feedback.
A practiced writer understands the importance of prewriting, including what to consider in planning a formal proposal, what to do during a proposal, and how to react after a proposal has been accepted or denied. This scenario involves AI-Mentor and the student in the planning proposal stage. The class teacher expects the student to frame the project to address three points: a. How clearly does the student understand their intentions and the tightness of the fit between the incident and its significance? b. Has the writer considered the relationship between the significance of the incident and its reception by intimate readers, i.e., peers, the teacher, friends, famil)? c) Has the reader considered nuances of writing a text using a memoir technique?
Writing the autobiographical incident about an incident that happened to the student within the past year helps assure the details are fairly fresh in mind. If the student has trouble coming up with an incident, subtly coax the student into talking about ‘big ‘moments’ that happened recently. Help the writer ‘zoom in’ and ‘zoom out’ on a big moment. The incident may or may not include dialogue. Helping the writer recall what the writer heard, saw, tasted, touched, or smelled could stir ideas about taking away the filter between the text and the writer. Narrative shows up by definition in the notion of ‘incident,’ but the essay will also include exposition and reflection.
[End of prompt]